My Cart

Close

GO. FIGHT. WIN.

JarVanka Let’s TALK ABOUT YOUR SF86...

Donate to Mad Dog

Posted on March 06 2019

Yo...JARVANKA go back to NYC ASAP... 

 As previously discussed Jared Kushner (and now Ivanka Trump) are in it, and by “in it” I mean that career Intelligence Community Officials, the career White House “security” all stated a disinclination of granting Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump a top secret security clearance. Those are not opinions, these are FACTS. It’s not like I haven’t talked about Jared’s EB5 problems, Jared’s massive SF86 problems.

 

 

As Eric Garland astutely explains in his PodCast - I am stone cold serious you need to listen to his podcast  it’s an exquisite mix of humor but informative AF. Two things I crave, daily. Trust me on this listen to Garland he breaks the SF-86 down in to nuggets that even I can understand 😉

<insert primal scream>

 

THERE. IS. NO. SUCH. “thing”

 

 

🇺🇸AS. A. PERMANENT. CLEARANCE🇺🇸

 

 

Got it? Good. Because I’m so sick of hearing or reading the Cable News Pundits, Anchors and reporters falsely using this phrase, precision and accuracy matter otherwise find a new line of work. But spreading and amplifying disinformation is something I’d expect Russia Today or Sputnik to do, not actual reputable American media outlets. Although maybe I should just make a bingo card and turn it in to a drinking game, but I’m not certain I want to suffer acute alcohol poisoning. Just saying.../snort\

 

 

Again it’s not like Gardland hasn’t been tweeting about the ever growing SF86 FUBAR that has now fully engulfed the White House. The obsequiousness of certain members of the  White House Staff who let “Trump be Trump” are. You. Freaking. Delusional? If we let Trump be Trump our Country will soon be under the command and control of Putin.

 

I’m a creature of DC when I see Jared & Ivanka obtain our County’s second highest clearance because princess batted her eyelashes. Literally Kremlin Ken and Barbie you. HAVE. NO. BUSINESS in our House, muchless unfettered access to our Country’s deepest secrets. These frauds have likely do what grifters do with new “toys” they monetized our Secrets.  Thusly these two present the single most National Security Risk to our Country. Although a photo finish tie with Orange Dotard. Let’s not forget Jared, Ivanka and Orange Daddy played footsie with MbS BONE SAW. You know the one who ordered the premeditated barbaric murder of one of our Journalists. And then lied about it after Trump gave then the “ rogue killers” - conspiracy theory, Furthermore MbS is currently holding a Doctor Walid Fitaihi,  who has dual citizenship. See October 2018 Twitter (archived) thread 

 

 

 

 

REAL Public Servants work goddamn hard to earn their TS clearance and Trump gives these away like party favors. Seriously at what point will the actual grown ups take over and give the incorrigible unhinged Twitler and actual Judicial Bench Slap, because I’m pretty fed up with every day, we careen from one Trump crisis to another. Bejesus it’s exhausting and it’s also abusive. At least three times a day I literally say out loud WTFINGF. 

Listen here Kremlin-mobbed up Money Laundering Ken & Barbie...the fecal matter is about to hit the oscaltor at full ludicrous mode, speed. So I hope you dextered what ever room you are standing in. Strap in because imma gonna drag you with nothing but facts.

For those of you who may not know understand the normal course of the SF86 form and process. Here are a few facts for you, as defined by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM July 2018 SF86 guide)

 

        • SF = Standard Form
        • SF86 - “Questionnaire for National Security Positions” and it’s “specifically for use in requesting investigations for persons seeking to occupy positions designated as National Security “Sensitive.”
        • SF86 - primary purpose: “conducting background investigations, reinvestigations, and continuous evaluations of persons under consideration for, or retention of, national security positions."
        • SCOPE - this can and does “vary depending on the duties and access requirements for the position, as does the amount of time it takes to be completed...the “sponsoring” agency, that initiated your investigation, is responsible for determining the appropriate level of investigation to be conducted based on current rules and procedures, not NBIB”

 

The SF86 (current version) is 136 pages long, it is an exhaustive form, and FFS the second sentence clearly states:

 

ALL questions on this form must be answered completely and truthfully in
order that the Government may make the determinations described below on
a complete record. Penalties for inaccurate or false statements are discussed below...

The SF86 leaves ZERO ambiguity for the applicant/candidate under following section of the FIRST PAGE of the PURPOSE for this Form it CLEARLY states (yes you’re goddamn right this raises my ire. The fact is career public servants work years and earn their Security Clearance(s), it’s not just given to them, because your daddy and/or father-in-law is Orange Prez BIGLY. It’s bullshit. It’s a mockery of the clearance process and most importantly Trump intervening is a big F to the U of our anti-nepotism statutes.

SF-86 on the truthfulness and accuracy of the applicant:

It is imperative that the information provided be true and accurate, to the best of your knowledge.

 

 

SF86 on withholding information:

Withholding, misrepresenting, or falsifying information may affect your eligibility for access to classified information, eligibility for a sensitive position, or your ability to obtain or retain Federal or contract employment.

In addition, withholding, misrepresenting, or falsifying information may affect your eligibility for physical and logical access to federally controlled facilities or information systems.

Withholding, misrepresenting, or falsifying information may also negatively affect your employment prospects and job status, and the potential consequences include, but are not limited to, removal, debarment from Federal service, loss of eligibility for access to classified information, or prosecution. (emphasis added)

 

Under the investigation process, the one datapoint that I haven’t seen any decent reporting is: Kushner had the amended his SF86 four times (that we know of) that would also factually speaking mean Ivanka would also need to amend her SF86 too, but no the Press doesn’t want to hold Ivanka Trump to the same level of scrutiny. Which makes me believe there’s a “double standard”, the Press wont hold Ivanka accountable because she’s “pretty”...seriously do you not see the blatantly hypocrisy and normalization of this bullshit subterfuge?

 

“...your honesty and integrity, vulnerability to exploitation or coercion, falsification, misrepresentation, and any other behavior, activities, or associations that tend to demonstrate a person is not reliable, trustworthy, or loyal. Federal agency records checks may be conducted on your spouse or legally recognized civil union/domestic partner, cohabitant(s), and immediate family members...”

 

With respect to penalties for withholding, misleading and/or falsifying information on your SF86...yes its criminal as in a felony:

The U.S. Criminal Code (title 18, section 1001) provides that knowingly
falsifying or concealing a material fact is a felony which may result in fines
and/or up to five (5) years imprisonment.

RELEVANT SECTIONS of the SF86

 

Again you can access the same OPM SF86 (November 2016 version here) there are several areas of the SF86 that require disclosure by the Applicant (as in Jared and Ivanka). I can not stress this point enough: yes Jared Kushner had to amend his SF86 at least four times (that we know of) that would mean that Ivanka Trump would also be required to update her SF86 as it relates to “spouse”, foreign travel, foreign government contacts, foreign investments, foreign loans. I do not understand why the media doesn’t press the White House on BOTH Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner’s SF86 filings, respectively...this is moy importanto.

Page 35, requires disclosure of “people who know you...”

 

Page 60+ would require both Jared and Ivanka to disclose any foreign contacts from 2009/2010 to 2016, res’ec 

 

 

Pages 68+ would require disclosure of foreign business interest and or holdings. Based on their previous and amended OGE financials one could easily conclude that both Ivanka and Jared had to amend their SF86 multiple times. THIS. IS. WHY. IT. IS. A. BAD. IDEA. FOR. THEM. TO. BE. WORKING. IN. THE. WEST WING because we have NO idea of knowing if they are making policy decisions in the best interest of our Country or for their personal/Businesses.

 

 

 

So my questions are:

When Jared Kushner updated his SF86 (at least four times) did Ivanka Trump also update her SF86, pursuant to sections;

Also since it is now proven that Kushner nor Trump are trustworthy It goes without saying did Ivanka Trump disclose the following foreign trips (again the SF86 REQUIRES) Disclosures for the past SEVEN years, which means any and all foreign trips and contacts from 2010 to 2017 ARE REQUIRED to be disclosed:

 August 18, 2016 Turnberry Scotland Trip per Ivanka Trump’s instagram post

 

 August 15, 2016 Ivanka Trump & Jared Kushner - Trip to Hvar Croatia 

 

August 14, 2016 vacation with Wendy (purportedly Putin’s girlfriend as per this March 2016 Vanity Fair Article) in Dubrovnik Croatia as per your instagram post?

 

 

  

July 28, 2016 (assumption you traveled to) Ireland per your own instagram post

 

 

June 26, 2016 your trip to Scotland, you silly lovebirds but the question remains did you disclose this trip on your SF86? Per your own Instagram post.

May 6, 2015 Trip to Dubai did she disclose this on her SF86? Because it’s not like she posted it on Instagram.../snort 

November 24, 2014 so Ivanka do you really “love” a hotel room with a view of that monstrosity of a hotel in Baku? Did you disclose the Baku Trip and the Baku Money, Honey on your SF86? It’s not like you didn’t post it on Instagram, oh shittlestix yes you did.

Ivanka Trump’s 2014 Baku Trip and multimillion business deal, see video she uploaded to social media in 2014...IRAGC something something...

Siri can you accept  millions of dollars in laundered money and then forgot to properly disclosed that AS REQUIRED BY LAW and still obtain a Top Secret Clearance?

Also Siri, can you forget to disclose MILLIONs in loans from foreign banks and not expect to be hauled into the FBI or FPS for further questions, pertaining to why you OMITTED those financial foreign  “loans” under sections 20A et al on your SF86?

oh and Siri, can you suborn perjury and set your daddy’s fixer up to be the Fredo even though Cohen debriefed Ivanka 10 freaking times about the Trump Tower Moscow project?

oh and one last thing, Siri can you actually obtain a Top Secret Clearance if there’s a counterintelligence investigation in to your shhhhaaaadddeeee real estate deals?

Just so we are crystal clear here Ivanka Trump not only lied about her daddy intervening...swear to gawd do not tell me “sources say Ivanka may not have known” that’s straight up normalization of this abnormal and abhorrent behavior. Trump et al have made a mockery of the very serious SF86 process.

 

 

Speaking of the super professional and super classy Trump Administration nothing says Respect mah authority like Lynn Patten of HUD dropping the “fucking” on her “official HUD/Government” twitter account, amirite? NYET 

 

 

Also you’ll want to check out Ivanka Trump’s Spa by Ivanka in Georgia (the Country not the State) it appears she’s scrubbed her personal Instagram account but the Spa’s Instagram is up.

This might be a tiny scoop but I noticed something odd, it’s a if Ivanka Trump’s Spa by Ivanka DC has scrubbed her from their account and deleted hundreds of social media post but it only appears to be her DC location (FWIW her DC Spa is nnnnaaaahhhsty, but then again I’m old school so I’d take the Ritz, the Red Door or the Salamander over Ivanka’s gross spa any day)...see her DC Spa Instagram account.

 

Also Nigel GTFO of my town I think you’ve done enough damage...

 

 

Ivanka...girl you are in so much Trouble...

18 USC §1622 subordination of perjury

 

 

18 U.S.C.§ 1622  SUBORDINATION of PERJURY;

Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. 

 

GPO link to aforementioned statute, keep in mind that it was Ivanka’s attorney who signed off on Cohen’s 2017 False statements to Congress.

 

 List of Individuals charged re SF86:

October 2017: Issac Lanier Avant, who is Chief of Staff for a Congressman, was charged with violating 18 USC §1001 (a) (2) - False Statements related to his SF86, he was also charged with violating 18 USC §2 (aiding and abetting ), you can read his indictment via this DOJ-OPA link.

 

 

 

July 2018:  Rose Gross, 62, a former background investigator who did work under contract for the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), pled guilty today to a charge stemming from her falsification of work on background investigations of federal employees and contractor...see DOJ-OPA link

February 2016: James Robert Baker, Naval Sea Systems Command employee, charged with identify theft and lying on his SF86, see Navy Times Article.

July 2015: Wei Chen, Defense Contractor Charged with Making a False Statement and Damaging Army Computers see DOJ-OPA link.

 March 2011: Karen M. Lancaster, Maryland Resident Charged with Making False Statements and Submitting False Documents in Applications for Federal Jobs, see DOJ-OPA link

 

Ivanka Trump is Complicit AF

I’m sick of the media giving her a pass.

 

While you're here, throw us a bone.

Mad Dog is thrilled to have Spicy in our PAC(k). We are proud to provide a space for her tireless, hard hitting, in-depth investigations. But we can’t do it without you.

Our numbers are growing. Our voices are being heard. Our campaigns are making a difference. Help us, and Spicy, continue to fight the good fight. Consider a donation to help support the work of Mad Dog PAC today.

DONATE

6 comments

  • Jane Anderson: March 07, 2019

    I miss you, but I can still read your great comments here, thanks for all the research you do

  • Marie G: March 07, 2019

    Great piece, Spicy. You know, I was actually thinking about these weasels as I took my annual certification on Anti-bribery and corruption. And, yes, I listened to Eric’s podcast this afternoon, LOL the “second home in Syria” tidbit. I hope these two are ready for barrel time. I know I am! 🍿

  • Kathy: March 07, 2019

    Thank you So much!

  • Peter Barnes: March 07, 2019

    I’ve always assumed (with no basis in fact, sorry Spicy) that Ivanka is the prize that they’ll use to force Individual-1 from office.
    “Resign, or the broad gets it” (condensed version).
    It’s inconceivable (I know what it means) that Ivanka isn’t guilty of enough serious crimes to put her into custody. Presumably they’ll follow the same well-trodden path of finally hauling her in front of the FBI or the SC and getting her to lie or throw dad under the bus. Either way, it’s then game over. Her plea deal will involve divulging enough dirt on dad that he’ll have the choice of seeing it all come out in an indictment (of Ivanka) or resigning to spend more time with his family (in prison). The alternative will be to add another twenty counts to Ivanka’s indictment and he can watch Kremlin Barbie go down for at least a ten stretch, and he’s still next.

  • Maureen: March 06, 2019

    Thanks, Spicy!

  • PilatesQueen (Tammi): March 06, 2019

    So many LOLZ at Jarvanka thinking they can provide willy-nilly updates to their SF-86 forms.

    What did you make of their lawyer’s public response this week that seemingly tried to distance him from their “lying” responses?

Leave a comment

All blog comments are checked prior to publishing